One of the reasons that Kurt Warner got so many individual accolades and awards during his three seasons of dominance with the St. Louis Rams from 1999-2001 was just how uninterested the Hall of Fame quarterback was in needing credit. It’s basically impossible for Warner to have as much success at the quarterback position as he did with the Rams without getting the most credit: He’s a two-time MVP, a two-time runner-up in Offensive Player of the Year, both times finishing second to teammate Marshall Faulk.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/73451162/661399188.0.jpg)
If you can win MVP while also helping your running back win Offensive Player of the Year, that seems pretty selfless to me.
Conversely, maybe Faulk is the most selfless. He could have won MVP three years in a row, or Warner could have, but they both worked better when playing off of each other.
Does that make one of them the most selfless Rams player in franchise history? That’s what we’re trying to find out in this week’s Reverse Q&A, also known as an A&Q for obvious reasons.
I’ll post six questions below related to the Rams, selflessness, selfishness, and perhaps other adjectives to describe former players and coaches. YOU give me the answers, which is the way that a mailbag should always be. I want to hear what the fans have to say, you’re the experts.
